When To Use Mobile Test Automation For Your App

The traditional process of testing software can be lengthy and cumbersome. That’s especially true in mobile — there’s a wide variety of devices and features you need to account for with mobile app testing. Enter functional mobile test automation, which when properly planned and executed, can be a real time saver. It can also spare your app development team some real headaches later by catching errors in the code early in the process.

Mobile check automation uses a series of programmed tests that check the expected behavior of the options to the particular outcomes. If the outcomes are aligned, you recognize that you’ve greatly reduced the possibilities of getting any bugs. If there’s a distinction, the QA team will determine the matter and therefore the development team can identify fixes — then the machine-driven tests are rerun before the app goes into production.

This automation is a good complement to ancient approaches of QA, wherever there's manual testing (by a human) for various user situations. And in several cases, it will facilitate scale back the number of manual testing the QA team has to perform.

However, mobile check automation will need some direct time investment. And doing it properly isn’t a matter of merely deciding to try and do it — you wish people that are ball-hawking in shaping and implementing the tests. You furthermore might want the correct tools to run the tests. And it needs AN understanding by your team of the way to use it — and what to expect from it — for it to essentially work for your project.

So before you start with machine-driven testing for your app, here are 5 queries you ought to consider:

How long can it fancy to develop your app and the way long will it live?

The longer a project can take and therefore a lot of advanced it's, the bigger the advantage of victimization machine-driven tests. Like several products, a lot of complexness in an app means that more potential bugs that may be introduced — and having an economical means of testing completely different situations become more crucial. Also, if you have got AN app that’s planning to be used for a protracted time and can want periodic updates, there’s a big profit in making purposeful tests and mechanically retesting for every new unharness. Having the ability to simply retest for every new OS update — just like the new iOS ten and robot candy — is additionally an enormous advantage of victimization mobile check automation. However, if you're making a reasonably straightforward app that may solely be used for a brief amount of your time, you may be OK solely employing a lot of the ancient QA approach.

Is your app within the early stages of development?

While you usually wish to arrange for mobile check automation at the onset of a project, you don’t wish to implement the tests too early within the development method. Particularly if the app’s options are subject to vary. Creating changes to the practicality means that you’ll additionally have to be compelled to create changes to your automation checks — which further effort will offset the potency gain of victimization mobile test automation.

But if your early feature set is solid — though you think that you'll later add new options — that’s the proper time to begin building in check automation. In fact, one in all the foremost helpful aspects of machine-driven testing is with automated mobile testing services— wherever you'll be able to make certain previous options are still operating as you add those new features.

Is mobile check automation an honest appropriate your app’s features?

Not all options of your app are price being machine-driven. as an example: A feature that involves the camera device should be tested on a physical device since offered tools can’t simply simulate this. You’d have to be compelled to perform tests by physically pressing the button to require a photograph and seeing if the action leads to a captured image. With some options, you risk disbursement longer automating testing than playacting the tests manually. And within the finish, you can’t place confidence in check automation to supply sensible coverage and reliable results for these styles of options.

To help verify whether or not or to not use check automation, take into account the subsequent ratio: the complexness of automating a feature vs. the importance of that practicality vs. the chance of a user experiencing bugs. If a feature is advanced to automatize however it's a vital a part of the user expertise and has an important relationship to different options of the app, then victimization mobile check automation is that the right call. However, if the feature is advanced to automatize and users of the app can solely use it during a} very specific scenario, it should not be well worth the effort of making machine-driven tests for the feature.

Does your app have repetitive features?

In several apps, you may have repetitive options that enable you to use a similar or similar check automation across those features. For example, if AN app asks for a user to register inline with age, the following screen might vary supported the selection a user makes. However, you'll be able to check the registration page entry by continuation a similar test through test automation but with the various alternatives by age leading to a special screen. For these options, machine-driven testing is fairly straightforward to use across multiple user situations — whereas manually testing may be repetitive and time overwhelming.

Will your app be compatible with multiple platforms and devices?

In several cases, mobile apps are developed to serve a good sort of device varieties and screen sizes. If you're the app is meant for several devices, victimization mobile check automation is even a lot of vital — particularly attributable to however time overwhelming it is to manually perform the tests on all of the various devices. However, if your the app may be a fairly straightforward app that’s solely designed for one platform, you may realize that victimization machine-driven app testing takes longer than doing ancient QA.

Now that you’ve answered those questions…

Hopefully by responsive our queries you currently have a basic understanding concerning once you ought to use mobile check automation. Of course, each project is exclusive and the way to travel concerning properly testing your app is rarely a black or white question. You can also learn more about automation testing via various online resources.

We generally use a mix of each form of testing on our comes. albeit we tend to use mobile check automation, we tend to still don’t eliminate manual tests. machine-driven app tests forever follow similar steps and methods, and manual tests supply the advantage of experiencing the app within the same method that a user may. Employing a combination of each offers you the most effective likelihood of eliminating bugs and guaranteeing your app delivers on its promise.

Are you prepared for iOS ten and robot Nougat?

Speaking of testing, iOS ten and robot candy have arrived. Is your app ready? If you’re undecided, don’t hesitate to contact the U.S. — we’re happy to require a glance ANd allow you to understand if you wish an update.